Посткоммунистические режимы. Концептуальная структура. Том 2 - Балинт Мадьяр

class="p1">Ср.: Kuzio T. Russianization of Ukrainian National Security Policy under Viktor Yanukovych // The Journal of Slavic Military Studies. 2012. Vol. 25. № 4. P. 558–581.

967

Nem ártatlannak való vidék [Невиновным тут не место] // hvg.hu. 23.01.2013. URL: https://hvg.hu/velemeny.nyuzsog/20130123_Nem_artatlannak_valo_videk.

968

O’Neil P. H. The Deep State. P. 4–6.

969

Мадьяр Б. Анатомия посткоммунистического мафиозного государства. С. 86–125.

970

Ср.: Там же. С. 95–102.

971

Hale H. Patronal Politics. P. 110–115.

972

Petrov N., Lipman M., Hale H. Three Dilemmas of Hybrid Regime Governance. P. 10.

973

Åslund A. Russian Resources: Curse or Rents? // Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2005. Vol. 46. № 8. P. 610–617.

974

Шляпентох В. Современная Россия как феодальное общество. С. 198–199.

975

Там же. С. 199–200.

976

Lanskoy M., Myles-Primakoff D. Power and Plunder in Putin’ s Russia. P. 78–79; Rochlitz M. et al. Performance Incentives and Economic Growth: Regional Officials in Russia and China // Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2015. Vol. 56. № 4. P. 421–445.

977

Lieberthal K. Introduction: The «Fragmented Authoritarianism» Model and Its Limitations // Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992. P. 1–30; Mertha A. «Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0»: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process // The China Quarterly. 2009. Vol. 200. P. 995–1012.

978

Heilmann S. 3.8. Between Fragmented Authoritarianism and a Re-Concentration of Power. P. 191.

979

Huotari M., Stepan M., Heilmann S. 1.5. Analytical Approaches to Chinese Politics // China’ s Political System. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016. P. 41.

980

Также см.: Duckett J. Bureaucratic Interests and Institutions in the Making of China’ s Social Policy // Public Administration Quarterly. 2003. Vol. 27. № 1/2. P. 210–237.

981

Schmidt D. K., Heilmann S. 2.5. Provincial– and Municipal-Level Governments. P. 87.

982

Tsygankov A. Mastering Space in Eurasia: Russia’ s Geopolitical Thinking after the Soviet Break-Up // Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 2003. Vol. 36. № 1. P. 1–27.

983

Carmody P. The New Scramble for Africa. Malden, MA: Polity, 2016.

984

Turcsányi R. Central and Eastern Europe’ s Courtship with China: Trojan Horse within the EU? // EU-Asia at a Glance. European Institute for Asian Studies, 2014.

985

Joshi M. China and Europe: Trade, Technology and Competition // ORF Occasional Paper. Observer Research Foundation. 05.2019. URL: https://www.orfonline.org/research/china-europe-trade-technology-competition-51115/.

986

Но см.: Kornai J. Economists Share Blame for China’ s «Monstrous» Turn // Financial Times. 10.07.2019; Braga P., Hall S. G. F. China’ s Emerging Liberal Partnership Order and Russian and US Responses: Evidence from the Belt and Road Initiative in Eurasia // Socialism, Capitalism and Alternatives: Area Studies and Global Theories. London: UCL Press, 2019. P. 131–157.

987

Csaba L. Válság – Gazdaság – Világ [Кризис – Экономика – Мир]. P. 216.

988

По данным Всемирного банка. См.: World Bank. GDP (Current US$). 12.09.2019. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ny.gdp.mktp.cd; World Bank. Population, Total. 12.09.2019. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL.

989

Dzarasov R. Semi-Dependent Capitalism: Russia // Socialism, Capitalism and Alternatives. P. 15–32.

990

Kotkin S. Russia’ s Perpetual Geopolitics: Putin Returns to the Historical Pattern // Foreign Affairs. 2016. № 3. P. 2–9.

991

Krickovic A. Imperial Nostalgia or Prudent Geopolitics? Russia’ s Efforts to Reintegrate the Post-Soviet Space in Geopolitical Perspective // Post-Soviet Affairs. 2014. Vol. 30. № 6. P. 503–528.

992

Ibid. P. 521.

993

Ibid.

994

Анализ с цивилизационной точки зрения см.: Katzenstein P. J., Weygandt N. Mapping Eurasia in an Open World: How the Insularity of Russia’ s Geopolitical and Civilizational Approaches Limits Its Foreign Policies // Perspectives on Politics. 2017. Vol. 15. № 2. P. 428–442.

995

Ср.: Bader J., Grävingholt J., Kästner A. Would Autocracies Promote Autocracy? A Political Economy Perspective on Regime-Type Export in Regional Neighbourhoods // Contemporary Politics. 2010. Vol. 16. № 1. P. 81–100.

996

Gerlach J. Color Revolutions in Eurasia.

997

Vanderhill R. Promoting Authoritarianism Abroad. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., 2012. Впрочем, Путин не поддержал единую пирамиду Плахотнюка в Молдове [♦ 7.3.4.4].

998

Tansey O. The Problem with Autocracy Promotion // Democratization. 2016. Vol. 23. № 1. P. 141–163; Way L. The Authoritarian Threat: Weaknesses of Autocracy Promotion // Journal of Democracy. Vol. 27. № 1. P. 64–75.

999

Veebe V., Markus R. Lessons from the EU-Russia Sanctions 2014–2015 // Baltic Journal of Law & Politics. 2015. Vol. 8. № 1. P. 165–194.

1000

Popescu N. «Outsourcing» de Facto Statehood: Russia and the Secessionist Entities in Georgia and Moldova // CEPS Policy Briefs. 2006. № 1–12. P. 1–8.

1001

Gelb B. A. Russian Natural Gas: Regional Dependence // Library of Congress, Washington DC Congressional Research Service, 2007. URL: https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA460847.

1002

Pomerantsev P., Weiss M. The Menace of Unreality. P. 22. Также см.: Leonard M., Popescu N. A Power Audit of EU-Russia Relations // ECFR. 15. 2007. URL: https://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR-02_A_POWER_AUDIT_OF_EU-RUSSIA_RELATIONS.pdf.

1003

Balogh E. Billions Diverted from